Your Cart

Your cart is empty

Home  >  Volume 35

Classification Into Two Groups With Different Cost of Misclassification Ratios by G. M. Oyeyemi and L. A. Oyebanji (pages 163-174)
Sale price: $5.00


Fisher’s Linear Discriminant and Bayesian Classification procedures were compared when the assumption of equal cost of misclassification is violated. The comparison was carried out at various samples sizes and different misclassification cost ratios. Data were simulated to consist two groups (populations) of four variables each from two multivariate normal populations. The homogeneity of the variance-covariance matrices of the two groups was tested using Box’s M-Test. The Apparent Error Rate as the estimate of the Actual Error Rate was used to judge the performances of both procedures at different misclassification cost ratios (1:1, 1:2, , , 4:5) and sample sizes (10, 20, 30, 40, , , 100). The results show that at equal cost ratio (1:1), both approaches produced almost the same error rate at different sample sizes. With difference in misclassification cost ratio, the Bayesian approach generally has higher proportion of misclassifications than the Fisher at various ratios and sample sizes. The Fisher performed better in small sample cases (n < 50) under all the cost ratios considered except 1:2 and 1:5. For large sample cases (n > 50), the performance was better at cost ratios 2:3, 2:4 and 2:5.

Keywords: Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Function, Baye’s Classification Rule, Apparent Error Rates, Cost of Misclassification, Cost Adjusted Prior Probabilities, Cost Matrix